[PRESIDENT RULE IN STATE (Article 356 of the Indian Constitution)]
"Court can only interpret the law and not rewrite or make the law in the name of interpretation."
Howsoever political topsy-turvy (उथल-पुथल) be in the State even to put the State Government in a situation not able to be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, because of Horse Trading of the members of the House even if championed by the Chief Minister visible on T.V. (Uttrakhand) or State Govt. downsized to monority (Tuki Govt.) in an extremely sensitive border State (Arunanchal Pradesh), the Governor are to shut their eyes and ears to such political developments ?
The answer is in big "NO".
This is not the spirit of Indian Constitution and intention of the constitution framers.
Needless to emphasize, the President may invoke Art. 356 on receipt of report from the Governor of a State or "OTHERWISE".
The guideline of "Floor test" in judicial precedents cannot be interpreted in 'ABSOLUTISM' but in 'RELATIVITY' & 'ENTIRETY OF THE SITUATION' instead.
No comments:
Post a Comment